Project - InstrumatedTorqueWrench.

Assignment Description

I was assigned to design a non-ratcheting, 3/8 inch drive instrumented torque wrench rated for 600 in-lbf.

The torque will be transduced by strain gauges on the sides of the torque wrench. The design goal is to maximize the voltage output of the wrench (mV/V) at the rated torque. The design is required to attain at least 1.0 mV/V output at the rated torque of 600 in-lbf. Higher output will lead to more sensitivity and improved signal-to-noise ratio.

The constraints are that the wrench must not fail due to static loading, crack growth, or fatigue.

The wrench must sustain a fully reversed torque of T = ±600 in-lbf for 106 cycles.

Design will include selecting an appropriate material and dimensions to meet or exceed the following requirements:

Basic Design and Hand Calculations

Material Selection

The wrench will be one solid body to avoid bonding weaknesses. Therefore, a single material was selected for the core structure.

The material must not be brittle, as a large elastic regime improves strain-gauge sensitivity. High fracture toughness is also critical due to reduced cross-section at the gauge location.

Aluminum alloys have far lower strength and toughness than steel and titanium. While M-series tooling steels have high stiffness, they generally exhibit reduced fracture toughness.

High Alloy Steel AF1410 was selected due to its high yield strength, fracture toughness, and Young’s modulus.

Yield Strength vs Fracture Toughness

High Alloy Steel AF1410

The wrench was designed for a maximum torque of 1200 in-lbf (100 ft-lbf). A full Wheatstone bridge strain gauge configuration was selected, providing twice the sensitivity of a half-bridge.

Basic Dimensions

Analytical Results

CAD Model

Full CAD Model

The CAD model follows the analytical dimensions. The handle width is reduced to 85% at the strain gauge section, with fillets applied to reduce stress concentrations.

Wrench Dimensions

FEM Analysis

Boundary Conditions

Zero displacement was applied at the drive, with a 37.5 lbf load applied at the grip, corresponding to 600 in-lbf torque.

FEM Solution

The reduced thickness at the strain gauge increased local strain by ~66%. Peak strain reached 1016 µε.

Stress concentrations at the drive reached 95.5 ksi, exceeding analytical predictions.

Post-Refinement Results

Strain Gauge